Discord Messages: Difference between revisions

759 bytes added ,  17:38, 21 September 2023
→‎23-09-21: new section
(→‎23-09-20: new section)
(→‎23-09-21: new section)
Line 995: Line 995:
|Text=[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-09-19]] - Upgrading to 4.2-RC2 while trying to write the [[Upgrade Mastodon]] docs. currently doing the merge from upstream and noticing db migrations for exclusive lists failing, but not fixing now because that would put the fixes in the `glitch-soc-main` branch which is a local mirror of upstream which gets force pushed. Seems like that should happen in the `merge-upstream` branch after upstream is merged
|Text=[[Tech WG/Ops Diary#23-09-19]] - Upgrading to 4.2-RC2 while trying to write the [[Upgrade Mastodon]] docs. currently doing the merge from upstream and noticing db migrations for exclusive lists failing, but not fixing now because that would put the fixes in the `glitch-soc-main` branch which is a local mirror of upstream which gets force pushed. Seems like that should happen in the `merge-upstream` branch after upstream is merged
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1049136631065628772/1052452072806686751/1153887188946268211
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1049136631065628772/1052452072806686751/1153887188946268211
}}
== 23-09-21 ==
{{Message
|Author=sneakers.the.rat
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/305044217393053697/2970b22bd769d0cd0ee1de79be500e85.png?size=1024
|Date Sent=23-09-21 21:37:59
|Channel=technical-wg
|Text=Btw I noticed we don't have [[Unattended Upgrades]] turned on to automatically keep system-level packages up to date. I usually do that with servers I manage because i have been told by security ppl that keeping up to date is like most of what matters with day-to-say security probs, but i mean it seems like it could uh accidentally break a package one day and kill the instance, so idk if there's a reason to not do that but thought i'd ask
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1049136631065628772/1049184335514828860/1154532004071747664
}}
}}