Discord Messages: Difference between revisions

700 bytes added ,  11:11, 23 March 2023
→‎23-03-23: new section
(→‎23-03-18: new section)
(→‎23-03-23: new section)
Line 533: Line 533:
So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.
So for the sake of us learning to write tests here, I don't think we need to aim for full adversarial coverage of the feature, but just get the basics: "when an account is in an exclusive list, their posts dont show up on the home feed." judging from the other tests, it looks like we'll have to also test for boosts from them, but since it's not like a block we don't have to test a bunch of edge cases like interactions.
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1049136631065628772/1086754322433450075/1086768028085141535
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1049136631065628772/1086754322433450075/1086768028085141535
}}
== 23-03-23 ==
{{Message
|Author=sneakers-the-rat
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/305044217393053697/2970b22bd769d0cd0ee1de79be500e85.png?size=1024
|Date Sent=23-03-23 15:11:22
|Channel=Will we allow bots on this instance?
|Text=re: [[PaperBot]] we also had talked about [[DOI Search]] and resolving urls to DOIs and embedding them in the [[JSON-LD]]. the DOI Search should actually be super easy if we do it by altering the hashtag regex. doing it by making it an additional search type would take a little more, as would doing automatic dereferencing, but all those sound like fun to me
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1049136631065628772/1053979587798904862/1088480116910346341
}}
}}