1,035
edits
Moderation: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
'''Uncategorized:''' | '''Uncategorized:''' | ||
* From https://indieweb.social/@jdp23/111321208794907032 | * From https://indieweb.social/@jdp23/111321208794907032 | ||
** https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.11250.pdf | ** [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.11250.pdf Towards Intersectional Moderation: An Alternative Model of Moderation Built on Care and Power] | ||
<blockquote> | |||
Justice models of moderation are concerned with repairing harms such as psychological distress, | |||
physical violence, oppression, marginalization, and threats to free expression. As Salehi [ 75] notes, | |||
framing online harms as a content moderation problem “assumes that the problem is individual | |||
pieces of content to be moderated—not people and their relationships.” In contrast, justice models | |||
focus on people and emphasis is placed on accountability and reparation to victims of online harms | |||
[ 75, 77]. For example, rather than top-down paternalistic models that can replicate the carceral | |||
logics described by Gray and Stein [ 36], justice-based models foster education, rehabilitation, and | |||
forgiveness. Sanctions would be proportionate to the violation, and decisions would account for | |||
context, focusing on behaviour rather than content. Justice models also foreground those who | |||
have been harmed to locate appropriate reparations [78, 79]. Finally, justice-based models move | |||
beyond “neutral” decision-making frameworks to frameworks that support communities making | |||
moderation decisions for themselves [75, 77]. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
* From https://blorbo.social/@azurelunatic/111321451009173943 | * From https://blorbo.social/@azurelunatic/111321451009173943 | ||
** http://wiki.dreamwidth.net/wiki/index.php/IRC#Rules | ** http://wiki.dreamwidth.net/wiki/index.php/IRC#Rules | ||