Moderation: Difference between revisions

1,674 bytes added ,  01:22, 30 October 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
Starting a list of links for now, but we should likely split this off into a separate page to be more of a public resource. Will annotate as i go through these, but dont have time to read all right now <3 ''-jonny, 23-10-29''
Starting a list of links for now, but we should likely split this off into a separate page to be more of a public resource. Will annotate as i go through these, but dont have time to read all right now <3 ''-jonny, 23-10-29''


'''Organizations:'''
* [[IFTAS]]
** https://mastodon.iftas.org/@iftas
** https://about.iftas.org/
** https://github.com/iftas-org/rfcs - seems inactive?
** https://github.com/iftas-org/resources
'''Uncategorized:'''
* From https://indieweb.social/@jdp23/111321208794907032
** [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.11250.pdf Towards Intersectional Moderation: An Alternative Model of Moderation Built on Care and Power]
<blockquote>
Justice models of moderation are concerned with repairing harms such as psychological distress,
physical violence, oppression, marginalization, and threats to free expression. As Salehi [ 75] notes,
framing online harms as a content moderation problem “assumes that the problem is individual
pieces of content to be moderated—not people and their relationships.” In contrast, justice models
focus on people and emphasis is placed on accountability and reparation to victims of online harms
[ 75, 77]. For example, rather than top-down paternalistic models that can replicate the carceral
logics described by Gray and Stein [ 36], justice-based models foster education, rehabilitation, and
forgiveness. Sanctions would be proportionate to the violation, and decisions would account for
context, focusing on behaviour rather than content. Justice models also foreground those who
have been harmed to locate appropriate reparations [78, 79]. Finally, justice-based models move
beyond “neutral” decision-making frameworks to frameworks that support communities making
moderation decisions for themselves [75, 77].
</blockquote>
* From https://blorbo.social/@azurelunatic/111321451009173943
** http://wiki.dreamwidth.net/wiki/index.php/IRC#Rules
* From https://mastodon.social/@skry/111322171115086962
* From https://mastodon.social/@skry/111322171115086962
** https://books.slashdot.org/story/09/02/09/1441227/managing-online-forums
** https://books.slashdot.org/story/09/02/09/1441227/managing-online-forums