Minutes:Mastodon Seed Council Initial Meeting: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 243: Line 243:
</blockquote>Notes/Discussion:  
</blockquote>Notes/Discussion:  


 
* '''Jordan:''' if we are aiming to be available to everyone equally and we have a relatively large org associated (NM), then we should be carful asking for money.
** We could ask for companies or well established PIs to pay, but not the general user.
** Conferences could be expected to pay into using the instance (NM could use this instead of Discord)
* '''Jonny:''' agree -- joining should not be a financial burden, but having the instance largely paid for by a single entity creates it's own risk. Even a nominal donation via a sliding scale can create a little more funding, good to have more funding that just the bare minimum. Everyone can feel like they own the instance.
** '''Jordan:''' 2 or 3 users donating $5 a month is a surplus <br />
== Proposals ==
== Proposals ==